One Step Now Education
April 24, 2026
discomfit
Words are often intriguing to me because I’m unsure of their base or I see a familiar base and I wonder if it’s the same. With discomfit, it’s the latter. Could the base possibly be <fit>?
This investigation will explore the verbal inflectional paradigm and see how the past participle can function beyond just tense. We’ll trace this word back through Middle English and the Norman Conquest, and along the way, you might discover that several common words share this same hidden connection, but perhaps not the one you think.
Meaning
What is this word’s meaning and how does the word function?
If you are discomfited by something, it causes you to feel slightly embarrassed or confused, according to the entry in the Collins dictionary, my favorite resource for student-friendly definitions. To assist with meaning, Collins offers the synonyms frustrate and defeat.
All three of these words are verbs. Verbs can be inflected for “tense” in English. To do so, we add the suffixes <-s>, <-ed>, and <-ing>. We can also add the suffix <-(e)n>, as in eaten or grown. This is known as the verbal inflectional paradigm.
We call the <-ed> form the past participle. The past participle of a verb forms the present perfect and past perfect “tenses.”
- She has been discomfited by her mother’s scolding.
- She had been discomfited by her mother’s scolding.
Some verbs use the <-(e)n> form as the past participle.
- I have eaten all of the cookies we made.
- We had eaten the whole pizza before we realized it had a cauliflower crust.
The past participle can also be used like an adjective.
- The smoked turkey was the centerpiece of the Thanksgiving table.
- We exchanged our blown tire for the spare.
We could do the same with the past participle for our word.
- He remained stoic, unlike his discomfited colleagues.
Structure
What are the elements that make up this word’s structure?
This is my hypothesis for our word’s structure so far:
dis + com + fit
The prefix <dis> occurs at the beginning of many words, often lending a sense of the opposite of the base’s meaning. We have words like disagree or disappear as proof.
The prefix <com> lends a sense of “with” or “together” in words like company or compromise.
Prefixes, which are bound, lend any of their lexical content, or “meaning,” to the base they are attached to. They do not carry this meaning in and of themselves. The prefixes <dis> and <com> can also lend other senses like in the words disaster and comprehend. For this reason, I don’t provide my students with those lists of affixes and their “meanings.”
Let’s check Etymonline to see if my proposed base <fit> connects to what the entry tells us.
The entry in Etymonline tells me this word has been with us since Middle English, around 1200. As with many words in this time period, we received the word from Anglo-French. The Norman Conquest occurred in 1066. The Normans were the “Norse men” who lived in the Northern part of France, around the areas of Brittany and Normandy. When they took over England after the Conquest, they brought their language and culture with them, which is why we have so many French and Latin terms introduced into our language during this time period.
In Old French, the word was desconfire, a combination of des- and confire. The Old French (OF) des was a form of the Latin dis. The word confire came from a combination of Latin com– and facere, “make or do.”
The Latin verb facere has many forms in English, of which <fit> is apparently one.
dis + com + fit
Let’s see if we can find other relatives that share the base <fit> derived from the Latin facere.
Relatives
What are the word’s relatives and history?
The word profit also comes from facere and has the base <fit>. This means that words derived from profit can go in a matrix with discomfit and its derivatives discomfiting and discomfiture. Let’s add nonprofit and profiteer. We could also add profitable and profitably.
What about benefit? A look at Etymonline tells me this word also has a source in Latin facere spelled <fit>. Therefore, let’s increase the size of our matrix with benefit and benefitting. (Although we wouldn’t represent the doubling of the <t>. A matrix is a static tool, showing elements, not dynamic, showing active processes like suffixing conventions).
The word fit itself meaning “be suitable” is from a Scandinavian source and would not be included in our matrix. Neither would it fit in the etymological circle. The etymological circle includes etymological relatives for the base under study. That also leaves out befitting, outfit, and retrofit. Unfortunately, it also leaves out misfit.
Graphemes
What can the pronunciation of the word teach us about the relationship of its graphemes and its phonology?
This word basically is pronounced the same as it looks, with one grapheme per phoneme. I can easily see a student confusing it with discomfort, especially if they have a non-rhotic accent. With a non-rhotic accent, speakers do not pronounce the /r/ after a vowel. Most Americans have a rhotic accent; British Received Pronunciation is non-rhotic.
A student might substitute a <u> or maybe even an <a> for the <o>, given that it is pronounced as schwa. However, once a student knows this is the common prefix <com->, that shouldn’t make that mistake, as there isn’t a <cum> or <cam> prefix. (The asterisk denotes incorrect forms)
Next Steps
What concepts from this investigation can we explore next to learn more about the English orthographic system?
You and your students can explore past participles. (Big Idea #4)
Sometimes I will collect data sets of words with particular prefixes like <dis> or <com> with my students. We will then see if we can sort for the sense they lend to the base. (Big Idea #4)
What are all the different bases derived from the Latin verb facere you can find? (Big Idea #7)
At first, I wondered if the base could possibly be <fit>. And it was! Just not the <fit> I was thinking about. That’s how these investigations sometimes work out. Your earlier hypotheses don’t exactly match up, but the ones you discover still fit.
Stay curious,
Brad
PS. Know a teacher who would love discovering that discomfit, profit, and benefit are all relatives? Forward this investigation and see if they can find even more words in this family.
PPS. If you’re interested in how to collect data sets for investigation like I mention in the Next Steps, then check out the book I wrote with Dr. Jennifer Petrich, Investigating English Spelling.
One Step Now Education
600 1st Ave, Ste 330 PMB 92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2246
Unsubscribe · Preferences
Leave a Reply